Every aspect of human life has evolved over centuries through
hit and trial method. Folk wisdom is not taught; it is learned. Deviation from
it can cost from loss of life to loss of face. This is true for individuals and
nations, alike. An adage of the military says,“you train as you have to fight
and you fight as you have been trained.” These are lessons learnt through
experiences of generations of soldiers over centuries and considered near gospel
truth globally. Most military commanders, especially those who are well versed
in history do not usually temper with lessons of folk wisdom. There are,
however, foolhardy people in every walk of life, and militaries are not immune
Indian army, indeed all branches of Indian armed forces are composed of
professional soldiers. They train hard and perform the defence of their country
in some of the most arduous circumstances and terrains.Both Pakistanand India
share the same roots but Pakistan has transformed its military over some time in
ways far different and far ahead especially after fighting the two decades long
A country’s military force is a disciplined body with a clear chain of command,
aim and objectives;it performsthe tasks that have been well thought out by the
best brains, during the peacetime. These plans are put to some strenuous
standards of wargaming and field exercises before adoption. Once adopted, the
forces quickly prepare their training doctrines and materials for etching these
plans in the minds of young and not so young soldiers and officers. Plans are
rehearsed in near actual operational settings as possible, with actual
equipment. All possible contingencies are thought out and practised during the
Wise Generals would like to train their armies in near similar areas and
equipment to draw true value from training. It is training for a war that costs
so much to the national exchequer and is annually hotly debated in parliament.
If training is not conducted as per operational dictates, it can be anything but
preparing for war.
Well, all armies are not fortunate to have an abundance of resources to train
with the full equipment needed. Resources are scared everywhere and effort is
made to use as less operational equipment for training as is realistically
possible. You cannot assume to have been well trained in tank warfare by using
Qing Qisinstead of tanks. This would not constitute training in the wildest of
Let’s jump from the theoretical framework to the world of sweat and blood.
Having trained with guns and tanks, the army cannot be expected to perform tasks
with clubs and stones. How can a commander worth his name and rank ask his
subordinate soldiers to guard the border post at the roof of the world with a
club (the preserve of a watchman and not a soldier) against well-equipped foe?
It would certainly make a good comedy show, but then the armies are not meant to
produce entertaining stuff at national borders. They are expected to perform the
given tasks and lay their lives during the discharge of their duty if need be.
Whether the above cited age-old military adage has been violated by the Indian
army in the ongoingSino-India standoff in Ladakh is nearly unbelievable. Well,
the government does give a political direction and aim to the army for the
conduct of military operations. The government has to listen to what their
professional soldiers say and then arrive at a workable plan which is well
within resources and political direction.
With what is available in media, it is evident that the Indian army went into
this conflict badly led. It is true at the strategic as well as tactical levels.
Modi government has been trying to play down the Chinese advances in Indian
territory;it directed the Indian army to move in with clubs and other equipment
of the non-firearm category. The government is right to set political limits to
the conduct of military operations in the current conflict by keeping a lid over
the escalation and avoiding spilling blood. That is the right of any political
The role of military leadership, and in there lies the catch, is to dissect the
political aim and direction, weigh in the task in its entirety and come up with
plans and ways to achieve the given task within the limits imposed. If the
military leadership finds that the task cannot be achieved within given
limitations, then they have to come up with suggested solutions. Political
leadership has to be apprised about military capability and limitations during
all phases of the crisis. Accepting political directions without questioning its
serious implications tantamount to the unprofessional approach leading to the
certain killing of your subordinates.
The Indian army was directed by their government to guard the Sino-India border
in the face of current standoff by deploying adequate numbers, using no
firearms, to manage the level of escalation. That Indian military leadership,
especially the newly created CDS, failed to apprise the political leadership
that the Indian army was not a border security force and couldn’t be expected to
contain or push back the Chinese army with sticks and clubs. They badly misread
the Chinese capability and perhaps fell prey to their propaganda of “surgical
strikes” absurdity and deployed poor under-equipped soldiers against the
standards of fighting a war.
The Indian army was never trained to fight without firearms (in that case,
martial arts training could have been emphasized over conventional curricula)
and contain an enemy advance. It looks extremely thrilling in Bollywood movies
where an actor soldier, takes on the gangs of enemy soldiers barehanded, throws
them all around, and wins the admiration of a pretty heroine and applauds of the
spectators. Real-world is very cruel and far from the glamour of the cinema
What happened is now available in public knowledge. India has admitted to losing
20 soldiers. There are rumours of more soldiers wounded and missing in action.
The Chinese may have been holding some Indians POWs as well. India has not been
left with a lot of options. India can choose to escalate or accept the loss of
territory as a new alignment of the Line of Actual Control with China. Both
options have their own merits and demerits.
Failure to respect age-old wisdom can cost dearly in the modern media-savvy
world. Loss of face and respect to India, which aspires for a permanent seat in
the UN Security Council, is topping on the cake.