Oman’s Policy of Neutrality, Peace and Tolerance II
Dr. Syed Mehboob
Economic and Political Analyst
http//: www.thenewslark.com
Oman practices a diplomacy that encourages all parties to give room to the language of tolerance and dialogue while exerting every possible effort to defuse tension, with wisdom, good advice and responsible cooperation. At the same time, Oman is ready to stand up to whoever attempts to undermine tolerance and dialogue or interfere in its internal affairs. For Oman and Omanis, dialogue is a key element in addressing all issues, both domestic and foreign.
Oman’s foreign policy never closes any avenue of communication, however difficult a given crisis might be. The Foreign Ministry is committed to the search for security and stability through peaceful means and dialogue, rather than conflict. The Sultanate of Oman does not adopt a policy of exclusions or boycotts when it finds itself in disagreement with the views or positions of others. Rather, it seeks to encourage others to adopt a policy of tolerance in order to achieve peaceful coexistence and fruitful partnership for all.
Oman’s foreign policy does not look for a security structure that favours the interests of any single power, but rather a security structure which accommodates the long-term and common interests of all those countries which are economically and strategically engaged with the region. Oman’s vision for its development rests on a commitment to be outward looking, to engage with the world, to communicate and to trade. The Foreign Ministry’s directions are therefore based on an internationalist outlook. This draws on the country’s long-established traditions. Oman has a centuries-old history as a trading nation – its seafaring relations with countries around the world were all established because Oman was an outward looking, engaged nation.
Oman is proud to enjoy good relations of cooperation and friendship with a wide range of states, across the Gulf and the Middle East, across the Indian Ocean, in the West and in Asia – even as longstanding ties and associations take new forms in a fast-changing world.
Oman is at home in the modern world of economic globalization. The Sultanate is a member of the World Trade Organization and it is at the forefront of developing new regional forums in which business and trade can flourish across national borders in a truly globalized way.
Oman’s new and expanding ports are establishing it as a key international hub, for logistics and trans-shipment, ensuring that Oman plays a prominent role in both regional and international trade in the decades ahead. Oman’s foreign policy follows a pragmatic approach, emphasizing geostrategic realities rather than temporary ideological positions. This means that Oman resists the temptation to allow passing events to determine policy.
This principle is rooted in Oman’s geopolitical situation, and, in particular, in the responsibilities that come from the Sultanate’s location overlooking the Strait of Hormuz, the Sea of Oman, the Indian Ocean and the Arabian Sea.
The Strait of Hormuz is a vital waterway for the world and the region – protecting it from conflict is a special responsibility. Oman therefore strives to maintain conversation with all parties at all times. Oman cannot afford to abandon this responsibility under any circumstances. This responsibility in turn requires that Oman maintains good relations with its neighbors. Neighbors are forever. Their views and interests may shift over time; policies and governments come and go. However, the people, and their culture, and the geography remain.
While Oman may have differences with certain governments, these are less important than the enduring people-to-people and nation-to-nation continuities that bind everybody. Oman’s pragmatic approach is based on the confidence that in the long term, mutual interests will outlast short-term difficulties. Oman’s neutral role emerges as crucial stabilizer in Gulf crises
Omani neutrality is no longer simply a political option; it is a genuine stabilizing tool, preventing the region from sliding into potentially catastrophic conflicts.
Oman has long held a unique position in the Gulf, pursuing a policy of positive and balanced neutrality over decades. This approach has enabled Muscat to act as a mediator during crises without favoring one side over another. What may appear to some as caution or restraint has, over time, become an effective instrument for preserving regional stability and preventing conflicts that could otherwise be catastrophic.
This role has been particularly evident during recent tensions between the United States and Iran, where Oman emerged as a central channel for communication and mediation, demonstrating the maturity of its diplomatic approach and its ability to navigate complex challenges.
In the final months of 2025 and the early months of 2026, regional concerns intensified following Israel’s military aggression against Iran in June 2025, which occurred within the framework of US-Israeli efforts to prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
The heightened tensions opened multiple potential scenarios, including the risk of a limited or broader nuclear conflict or the intervention of other states as potential mediators. In this tense environment, Oman emerged as almost the sole channel with which Iran would engage seriously, granting Muscat both extraordinary influence and significant responsibility.
Oman’s foreign policy is based on what can be described as “positive neutrality.” This does not reflect support for one side against another, but rather a state strategy designed to protect regional security and promote dialogue, while avoiding bias or direct intervention.
This approach has positioned Oman as one of the few Gulf powers able to maintain communication with Iran during periods of acute tension, whether to convey messages or contain potential threats, allowing Oman to exert indirect influence over both sides’ decisions.
Omani history is filled with examples illustrating the success of this approach. Oman hosted secret talks between the United States and Iran prior to the signing of the 2015 nuclear agreement, mediated prisoner exchanges, relayed messages in times of crisis and maintained dialogue when others ceased communication. The Omani approach relies on a philosophy of balance and non-intervention, grounded in the country’s political culture and religious pluralism, which enables continued cooperation and coexistence with stronger, more volatile neighbors.
In January 2026, when fears grew over potential US strikes following the violent suppression of protests in Iran, Oman played a pivotal role in persuading Washington to postpone any military action, giving Tehran an opportunity to de-escalate tensions. This intervention was not merely symbolic; it involved concrete steps, including a temporary reduction of US forces at Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar, issuing security advisories through regional embassies, and urgent diplomatic efforts by Gulf leadership to prevent the conflict from erupting.
The episode highlighted a clear shift in Gulf states’ perceptions: what was once seen as unhelpful Omani neutrality has now become a vital element in preventing escalation and maintaining stability. Oman’s increasing significance goes beyond simply relaying messages. Effective mediation requires Oman to press Tehran to accept limited but decisive steps, such as reducing nuclear enrichment levels or facilitating access for International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors. These measures build trust and reduce the risk of escalation without compromising Oman’s core policies. ( Continued )
|