Declassified documents of the
CIA, Snowden’s disclosures, WikiLeaks’ leaks and most of the Indian and Bengali
authors like Manaksha, Arun Dhati Roy and Sarminla Bose, admit that the
dismembering of Pakistan and creation of Bangladesh was part of a greater
conspiracy, and Awami League’s Mujib-u-Rehman was only part of that conspiracy.
This has also been revealed latest by UK journalist David Bergman who has been
convicted by Hasina Wajid government court for also being critical of recent war
crime death sentences to some pro-Pakistan JI leaders.
A similar conspiracy on further dismembering Pakistan is reportedly being
followed to get Balochistan separated, for which not only Indians openly admit
that they are supporting, funding and arming Baloch insurgents, but also
harbouring and sheltering Brahamdagh Bugti and other rebels as well as training
and running camps to infiltrate terrorists there. This conspiracy seems to have
international backing as the US Senate Committee has already held hearing on
Balochistan to suggest its secession. Various world countries are sheltering
Baloch separatist leaders and the funding is going on unabated.
Indian PM Modi’s government has suspended talks on the pretext that Pakistan is
exporting terrorism. Gen Musharraf the other day asked BBC in an interview the
other day why India is not dubbed as exporter of terrorism when there are
documentary evidences and proofs of it? Similarly, the Mujib-led separatist move
was political one, just as in the ongoing insurgency, the onus is on political
leadership to come forward and resolve it. So why should the 1971-debacle be
called as military defeat and why not the political one, and why not the current
mess is called political mishandling and not the militarily one? Army operation
must always be a last option, exhausting all other options. Are we left with no
other option but to call military in and shift the responsibility from
politicians to generals?