US-Policy towards Afghanistan
(Sarah Ahmed Malik, Lahore)
The new administration is
basically the realist in approach of setting the different goals. During
February 28, 2017, the address to a joint session of Congress, U.S. President
Donald Trump vowed to “demolish and destroy” terrorist groups such as the
Islamic State (also known as ISIS). Along with its current diplomatic
intelligence, and the current development, the Trump administration is still
increasing the number of troops to Afghanistan in order to control the security
but this is basically not the solution for the issue of Afghanistan. The United
States ought to retain the small military force in the country or slightly above
the current level which is of 8,400 U.S. soldiers. It could definitely be
resolved by considering other options such as the use of soft power, but Trump
administration is not keen to do so. This is the only reason thatrecently we saw
the dropping of Mother of all bombs which is known as MOAB in Afghanistan on
ISIS. In some ways, Trump inherits a more challenging situation in Afghanistan
than his predecessor did. In 2016 and 2017, the Taliban slightly increased their
control of territory in rural areas of Afghanistan’s East and North. More than
50% control in Afghanistan is by Taliban’s movement.
On other hand, all the countries in which the United States is militarily
engaged against Islamist extremists, Afghanistan is one of the few in which the
local government has welcomed U.S. armed forces. This reality does not diminish
the importance of Iraq, Libya, Syria, and other frontline states battling
terrorist groups but it actually means that Trump should make Afghanistan and
neighboring Pakistan an important and enduring part of the struggle against ISIS
and other extremist groups and states. The main objectives in the policy towards
Afghanistan is the use of hard power again as Trump weighs more troops to
Afghanistanand this was the reason, his statements show his stance clearly that
they will destroy and demolish terrorist groups and the tool is again in the
shape of increasing number of troops and MOAB dropping. US also assures their
assistance for Afghan Government to protect their different interests. Trump is
also revising the use of hard power which was experienced by his party mate Bush
anditactually seems harmful for the peace in the region.
US interests are to be protected by improving the capacity of the Afghan
government and the local allies as much as is feasible. There are so many
options for stabilizing the situation of Afghanistan. First of all, U.S
diplomats need to continue the encouraging governance reforms in the country
which includes the helping andorganizing transparent elections and undermining
large-scale public corruption. Secondly, the United States should continue to
keep at least the current number of 8,400 forces in Afghanistan rather than
increasing the number of troops as Trump has increased 10000 more. It seems the
wish to use of hard power is again rising by USA, which is not a good sign for
peace in the region.