A Critical Review of Dr. Ramesh Kumar Vankwani's 'Election Astrology'"

I recently read Dr. Ramesh Kumar Vankwani's column "Election Astrology" in Jang and The News. It's a fascinating read, combining the ancient practice of Vedic astrology with the pressing matter of Pakistan's upcoming 2024 elections. In a country deeply rooted in tradition yet evolving rapidly, this blend of old and new perspectives is both intriguing and significant.

Dr. Vankwani's column predicts the political future based on astrological signs, particularly focusing on figures like Asif Ali Zardari. He suggests that the year 2024, governed by Saturn, will be favorable for those who have put significant effort into their political careers. This blending of celestial predictions with political forecasting is unusual but not entirely surprising, given the cultural significance of astrology in Pakistan.

However, my concern lies in the implications of such beliefs in the realm of politics, especially at a time when the topic of elections is a hot discussion in our country. Astrology, while an integral part of our cultural heritage, operates on a belief system that lacks empirical support. Politics, in contrast, is a field driven by real-world issues and tangible evidence. Relying on astrology to predict political outcomes risks oversimplifying the complex political landscape of Pakistan.

The impact of astrology on public perception and decision-making cannot be overstated. In a country where many people hold strong beliefs in astrology, such predictions could influence voter behavior and public opinion. This influence is particularly concerning in the context of elections, where rational, informed decision-making is crucial.

Furthermore, there's a broader conversation to be had about the role of traditional beliefs in contemporary politics. While respecting cultural practices is important, there's a fine line between tradition and the practicalities of governance. When leaders start relying on astrological predictions rather than data and expert advice, it could lead to decisions that aren't in the best interest of the public.

Given these considerations, Dr. Vankwani's column, while engaging, should be approached with a critical mind. It opens up a necessary conversation about the intersection of traditional beliefs and modern political practices in Pakistan. As we move forward, it's essential that our political discourse remains grounded in reality, informed by facts and evidence, and reflective of the diverse views that shape our society.

Dr. Vankwani's article reminds me that as Pakistan gears up for the 2024 elections, it's important to blend respect for our traditions with smart, informed thinking. Let's use this piece as a starting point for more thoughtful talks about our future, making sure our choices are based on clear facts and real-world understanding, not just the stars.