ISLAMABAD - Amid a rising controversy involving the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Bill 2023, President Dr Arif Alvi may ask the apex court whether the new legislation is under the Constitution of the country, and invoking the Court’s advisory jurisdiction under Article 186 of the Constitution is not contrary to the Supreme Court’s rules, it has been learnt. The amendments made in the Supreme Court’s rules by the government by passing the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Bill 2023, which aims to deprive the office of the chief justice of Pakistan of powers to take suo-motu notice in an individual capacity, have sparked a fresh debate in the legal and political circles, especially on the motives behind the legislation. The move on part of the government comes at a time of a heightened political temperature and an unprecedented controversy regarding holding the general elections in the two provincial assemblies of Punjab and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa as the apex court due to deliver verdict on the issue within days.
Punjab Governor urges to bring children suffering from autism into social circles
According to the sources in the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, the president may send a reference under Article 186 of the Constitution, which is related to the Supreme Court’s advisory jurisdiction. It says, “If, at any time, the president considers that it is desirable to obtain the opinion of the Supreme Court on any question of law which he considers of public importance, he may refer the question to the supreme court for consideration. The Supreme Court shall consider a question so referred and report its opinion on the question to the president.”
“Given the controversy revolving around the Supreme Court Bill, 2023, it is likely that the president sends a reference to the apex court so as to get advice on the same,” said a source privy to the development.
The Senate passed the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Bill 2023 on March 30, after the federal cabinet approved it on March 28. The National Assembly had passed it a day ago as well. After the bill was passed by the Senate, Senate Chairman Sadiq Sanjrani sent it to President Arif Alvi for his assent the same day, reflecting the urgency on part of the government.
Imran Khan responsible for ‘economic, political & constitutional crises’: Marriyum
The 13-party ruling alliance is contesting the case of holding the elections in Punjab and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa in the Supreme Court and the bill is being seen as an attempt to curtail powers of the chief justice who is heading the three-member bench. On matters where the interpretation of the Constitution is required, the bill said the committee would compose a bench comprising no less than five apex court judges for the task. The bill additionally said that a party would have the right to appoint its counsel of choice for filing a review application under Article 188 of the Constitution.
On the other hand, the PTI has termed the legislation an attack on the judiciary. In a recent interview, President Alvi termed the timing of the bill questionable, suggesting that it could have been presented at another time. “It’s premature to say what I will decide as I have not seen the bill. This is a time of crisis, and I wish to play a positive role,” the president said. President Alvi has usually created hurdles in the legislation since the incumbent government came into power in April last year.
Coalition parties demand holding of general polls on single day across Pakistan
To add to the controversy, a special Supreme Court bench, with a two to one majority, ordered suspending all suo-motu cases — under Article 184(3) of the Constitution — until amendments are made to the Supreme Court Rules governing the chief justice’s discretionary powers. However, the Supreme Court, in a circular on March 31 ‘disregarded’ the judgment authored by Justice Qazi Faez Isa, ordering the postponement of suo-motu cases till amendments are made in the Supreme Court Rules 1980 regarding the discretionary powers of the chief justice to form benches.
In its circular, the Supreme Court noted that the observations made by the majority judgment in paras 11 to 22 and 26 to 28 were beyond the matter fixed before the court and ‘invokes its suo-motu jurisdiction’. Interestingly, the Supreme Court issued the circular hours before a four-member bench was to start hearing the Punjab and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa election delay case. The circular noted that the ‘unilateral assumption of judicial power’ in such a manner violated the rule laid down by a five-member judgment. Justice Shahid Waheed, however, raised objection, penned a dissenting note against the order saying that the points raised and discussed in the order were not subject of the case.
SC can send packing another PM on Monday: Fawad
At one hand, an SC bench suggested amendments in the Supreme Court rules to regulate Constitution on the apex court benches and on the other hand, the parliament passed a bill to end the ‘one man show’, giving new thrust to the continuing debate.
The president mentioned in an interview that whenever he gives an opinion, it is termed that it is not him, but of the PTI. The president’s comment came after Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif informed Alvi that his letter regarding the Punjab and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa elections read like a PTI press release.
The PTI says that the bill reeks of serving personal interests. They believe that an effort is being made to give relief to PML-N supremo Nawaz Sharif by passing the bill which said that right of appeal would also extend retroactively to those aggrieved persons against whom an order was made under Article 184(3) prior to the commencement of the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure), Bill 2023, on the condition that the appeal was filed within 30 days of the act’s commencement.
Met office predicts dry weather