The Calculated Retreat: Why Leadership Prudence is Paramount in Pakistan's Political Arena
In the tumultuous landscape of Pakistani politics, where the civil and military establishments often intersect to create formidable opposition, the true measure of a political or revolutionary leader lies not just in their resolve to fight, but in their wisdom to survive. Recent history offers stark lessons: the strategic retreat that saved a movement from annihilation versus the aggressive confrontation that led to its dismantlement. The ability of leadership to safeguard its human capital from what are often termed 'Establishment traps' is, in this scenario, the most vital leadership ability.
The Model Town Massacre: A Lesson in Restraint
The 2014 Model Town Massacre in Lahore stands as a chilling example of state cruelty. When police opened fire on activists of Minhaj-ul-Quran (MQ) to clear barricades near the residence of Dr. Tahir ul Qadri, 14 workers were killed. The situation was one of extreme provocation, a moment custom-made for a violent, retaliatory response that could have spiraled into a full-blown confrontation, ing a complete crackdown.
Yet, as reports suggest, Dr. Tahir ul Qadri’s leadership demonstrated remarkable prudence. By allegedly ordering his workers not to return fire, he prevented the clash from escalating into a reciprocal bloodbath. This calculated non-response, in the face of straight firing, was not a sign of weakness, but a strategic move to deny the state the pretext for a more brutal operation that could have wiped out his entire workforce and movement. Furthermore, his subsequent counsel to workers to halt their march to Lahore, wherever they were, was a crucial, timely decision to de-escalate and save the lives of those heading into a pre-set security trap. He secured a moral high ground by positioning his party as the victim of state terrorism, avoiding the trap of becoming a 'militant' organisation to be dealt with by force.
The PTI Scenario: Confrontation and Collapse
In contrast, the experience of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) following the arrest of its leader, Imran Khan, culminated in the tragic events of May 9th, 2023. While the popular outrage was undeniable, the subsequent country-wide 'useless strikes and rallies' that resulted in attacks on sensitive military installations played directly into the hands of the Establishment.
The aggressive response, which saw party workers allegedly engaging in violence and vandalism, provided the state apparatus with the perfect justification for an unprecedented and crippling crackdown. This confrontation-first approach resulted in thousands of arrests, the trial of civilians in military courts, the departure of key leaders, and the near-dismantling of the party structure, ultimately trapping the leadership and its dedicated workers in a web of legal and political persecution. The failure to pivot from mass mobilisation to a safer, more sustainable form of protest sealed the movement's immediate fate.
The TLP Trap: The Cost of Aggressive Mobilisation
The Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) offers another cautionary tale. Known for its effective use of street power and religio-political mobilisation, TLP has repeatedly found itself in violent clashes with state agencies. While their protests successfully extracted concessions at times, their aggressive mobilisation, which often involved confrontation with law enforcement and disruption of public life, was consistently leveraged by the state. The cycle of violent protests followed by arrests, a temporary ban, and then eventual negotiation often leaves the rank and file vulnerable. Each episode risks greater fatalities and legal baggage for the activists, a heavy toll on the most valuable asset—the human force. The push for maximum confrontation, rather than strategic gains, makes the organisation inherently prone to being targeted as a 'security threat,' leading to proscription or punitive measures against its members.
Leadership: The Art of the Possible
The ultimate objective of a revolutionary or political movement is not simply to fight, but to achieve favorable results. This axiom holds especially true in a state like Pakistan where non-democratic forces wield immense power. The success of any mass-based struggle is fundamentally dependent on the response of civil society and common people.
Fighting an unwinnable battle against the state—particularly one with a monopoly on coercive power—when the public is not fully on board, is not a sign of freedom; it is a recipe for disaster. Effective leadership must:
1. Read the Room: Accurately assess the state's capacity and willingness for violence.
2. Protect the Force: Prioritize the safety and legal security of the man force over symbolic, but counterproductive, confrontation.
3. Ensure Public Buy-in: Recognize that without the active, peaceful joining of civil society, the efforts of a small Tehreek are easily isolated, rendered useless, and eventually demolished along with its workers.
Dr. Qadri's move to withdraw and consolidate, while PTI’s and TLP's tendency towards aggressive, unsustainable confrontation, highlight a crucial lesson for all political forces in Pakistan: Prudence is the highest form of political courage. The most important leadership ability is the wisdom to know when a calculated retreat is the only way to save the army for a better, more favourable battle tomorrow.
|