Democracy and Leadership

(Fahad, Islamabad)

A democratic style of leadership is exactly the opposite of an authoritarian leader, in that an authoritarian leader will make all the decisions and a democratic leader will allow others to make the decisions. The democratic form of leadership is also known as the participative form of leadership. This is not to say that a democratic leader does not actually lead – an effective democratic leader fosters self-direction, promotes creativity, and encourages others to become leaders. This is attained through constant consultation and effective direction and assistance.

During the 1970’s, interest in improving industrial work practices moved from a hierarchical organizational structure to giving employees more decision-making authority to increase productivity. Studies from Mayo and later refined by Maslow, McGregor, and Likert (Biddle, 1994) suggested that changing the way workers are treated as a more positive asset rather than ‘hired help’ would result in:
• Motivated employees
• A loyal workforce
• High levels of productivity
• An industrious and harmonious workforce

Democratic leadership may not work in all job environments. The structure of an organization depends on the level of worker qualifications of the assigned duties and the situation of each job tasks. For example, as a democratic leader, I would not give an assignment where an individual or groups have difficulty finding resources for answers. Instead, this type of leadership style works best when you allow employees to give their ideas to create a more efficient work flow, suggest cost-cutting techniques, use in creative industries such as advertising.

When is it used?
When situations change frequently, democratic leadership offers a great deal of flexibility to adapt to better ways of doing things. Unfortunately, it is also somewhat slow to make a decision in this structure, so while it may embrace newer and better methods; it might not do so very quickly.

Democratic leadership style can bring the best out of an experienced and professional team. It capitalizes on their skills and talents by letting them share their views, rather than simply expecting them to conform.

If a decision is very complex and broad, it is important to have the different areas of expertise represented and contributing input – this is where democratic leader shines.

There will be many times in your educational career when you will be called upon to lead a discussion group or a project.
There are several different approaches to being an effective boss or project leader. Some people are born with a natural style and some can learn to mold their behavior to fit any situation. Understanding each style is important in order to maximize your leadership skills. Do you know which style you have? Do you know how and when to alter your leadership style?

There are three major types of student leadership roles. You will find that there is an appropriate time and place for each style. As you progress in your studies, you may want to learn skills and techniques from each leadership style.

Autocratic leadership
This form of leadership is one of the least desirable when it comes to building trusting relationships and making friends! In a system of autocratic leadership, one person has control over all of the workers or followers. The leader is in complete control and no one is permitted to make any suggestions or offer any opinions, no matter how it may benefit the group.
When it comes to leading a group in school or in a group project, you will find that autocratic leadership can make you very unpopular. If communication and trust are important, you don’t want to lean too far toward autocratic leadership.
But there is a time when autocratic traits can prove beneficial. This form of leadership is effective when absolute control is needed over a group. Have you ever worked on a group project that fell flat? That happens when no strong leader is present.

Benefits of Autocratic Leadership
Group projects require strong leadership. Without it, nobody gets a full understanding of what is required of anybody else. Unfortunately, that often means that some group members procrastinate and wait for others to do the work. In the end, the project suffers (and so does your grade!).

If your group plans to work online at all, you should really think about electing a strong leader. This leader should be willing to take charge, divide the work, and set deadlines. He or she must take full control. Communication is difficult enough when it comes to group work, but when technology is involved it often breaks down completely.

If your group attempts to communicate via email or other electronic communication, strong leadership is an absolute must! It is wise, when working in a group, to assign a strong leader with some autocratic tendencies.
Bureaucratic Leadership

This style of leadership follows a close set of standards. Everything is done in an exact, specific way to ensure safety and/or accuracy. You will often find this leadership role in a situation where the work environment is dangerous and specific sets of procedures are necessary to ensure safety.

In the working world bureaucratic leadership skills would be best utilized in jobs such as construction work, chemistry-related jobs that involve working with hazardous material, or jobs that involve working with large amounts of money.

Benefits of Bureaucratic Leadership
In school work, you may find that bureaucratic leadership skills are necessary when working on a group project for a science class. Precision is key in a science project, and meticulous notes are essential.

A natural bureaucratic leader will tend to create detailed instructions for other members of a group. This type of leader would also be very successful working in student government roles.

Democratic leadership
Under democratic leadership, the people have a more participatory role in the decision making process. One person retains final say over all decisions but allows others to share insight and ideas.

This is often a highly effective form of leadership. People are more likely to excel in their positions and develop more skills when they feel empowered, and people are empowered when they are involved in the decision-making process.
Although it may take some time to achieve full participation from a group, the end result will be rewarding if you can manage to establish a power-sharing environment in your group project. You will find that democratic practices often lead to a more productive and higher quality work group.

It doesn’t take too much imagination to think of ways that democratic leadership could backfire during a group project. As you probably know, some members of a group will work well on their own and complete all work in a timely fashion. But there are other workers who will procrastinate—and that can lead to disaster.

If you are a natural democratic leader, it might be necessary to learn some traits of the autocratic or bureaucratic leaders and tap into them as necessary. Always have a backup plan on hand!

Fahad Zeb
About the Author: Fahad Zeb Read More Articles by Fahad Zeb: 4 Articles with 4012 views Member of Youth Parliament of Pakistan.
Supporter and member of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf.
Well-wisher of Pakistan.
.. View More