Election 2014: is a fight between Secularism & Hindutava

(Shams Tabraiz Qasmi, India)

Election 2014 after some days is going to end. But still it could not decide, which party is going to form the government and what would happen on 16 may. The Congress has accepted its befitting. Such as Union Minister Salman Khurshid on Saturday said “The Congress could consider extending support to the Third front or taking its help, if necessary to form the government at the Centre after Lok Sabha polls”.

He claimed that Narendra Modi was going to emerge as a “big problem” for BJP and referring to Ram temple movement, said that when “Bhagwan ki lehar” (God’s wave) could not stop Congress, then how can “Modi wave” stop it.

There is arising a question. Are there any Secular Parties in India?

The Hindutva forces comprising of RSS, BJP and myriad other formations have clear anti Muslim ideological pronouncements and active involvement in innumerable communal riots including the reprehensible Gujrat carnage of 2002 supposedly with the use of state machinery and complicity of Narendra Modi, the Chief Minister of the State. Such history and track record seems to make BJP a fit candidate to be labeled a communal group. But what about parties like the Congress, BSP, SP, RJD, JDU and others. Are they indeed secular? Isn’t The Congress responsible for the demolition of Babri Masjid and Comedown of Muslims for the last sixty years?

It is important to understand that the danger from

BJP lead by Modi is not just to the Muslims Community But more than to secular character of our country and democracy. A simple analysis of the build up and the conduct of the campaign for 2014 general elections reveals emergence of Narendra Modi as the leader sidelining all others, including stalwarts like Advani and subverting the party itself. If BJP indeed comes to power, then the character of the new government will not be defined so much by the party but by Narendra Modi. as well as the so called Gujarat Model.

The Samajwadi Party (SP), that came to power mostly due to the Muslim vote in 2012 but allowed over a hundred communal clashes within a year of its rule culminating in the reprehensible riot in Muzaffarnagar that killed more than 200 and displaced over 60,000 Muslims, communal or secular?. Modi is indeed answerable for the Gujrat carnage as the Chief Minister. But why should not the Chief Minister of UP, Akhilesh Yadav, be held equally accountable for the riots in Muzaffarnagar.

As a final point we seem to have succeeded in dividing India, a country of a billion plus, into just two groups. Both groups claim to be secular. The only difference is that while one group accuses the other of being communal, the other brands the first group of being fake secular.

Secularism and fake secularism have become major planks in India for acquiring political power.

Intellectuals from across the world and Great Islamic Scholars have also made appeals not to vote for communal parties (meaning BJP) and save secularism. On the other hand, BJP and its allies by questioning the deception and limitations in the practice of secularism by Congress and others seem to be succeeding in influencing the people on the street enough to make them equate secularism with Muslim appeasement and hence the increasing polarization.

even though any talk of secularism immediately brings into focus and mostly revolves around the Muslim and to some extent the Christian community - excluding multitude of other religions, sects and social groupings that make up India and seems to imply that secularism is essentially a requirement of Muslims and not so much for other communities, especially the majority community, or for the country.

Secularism in India (with its religious, caste, linguistic, ethnic and regional diversities) necessary only for Muslims and are secular credentials to be gauged by determining if you protect or harm Muslims?

When such dictatorial mindset and practice is back by an ideology Hindutva in this case, it becomes an ideal recipe for a fascist state. So what is at stake is not just secularism but the very continuation of democracy in our country. If there is no democracy, there can be no secularism, freedom of expression, entitlements and so many other values that are essential for any society to sustain and prosper.

It is time people of India apprehend that in their mad move quickly to vote for or against secularism, they should not end up sacrificing the very core essence of our nation: Democracy.
Email:[email protected]
 

Shams Tabrez Qasmi
About the Author: Shams Tabrez Qasmi Read More Articles by Shams Tabrez Qasmi: 214 Articles with 180627 views Islamic Scholar, Journalist, Author, Columnist & Analyzer
Editor at INS Urdu News Agency.
President SEA.
Voice President Peace council of India
.. View More