Let it be at least apolitical

(Khurram Shahzad, Karachi)

The political impasse we have gone through during last few months in the country with protesting groups of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) led by Imran Khan and Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) by Dr. Tahirul Qadri, observing sit-ins at capital city of Islamabad, blocking sensitive Red Zone area and threatening vital government buildings not only cast negative impacts causing fretful anxiety for all segments of society but embroiled various state institutions. The demonstrations have been prolonged and extended unnecessarily, as the government of PML (N) led by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif could not grab the initiative to settle the issue through peaceful dialogue due to its lethargic strategy.

Failure to initiate a dialogue and a weak approach to use force against the protesters resulting into killings in Islamabad by the Police including assaults on the reporters and vehicles of the private TV channels have further spoiled the situation. The use of force by government engendered the demonstrators who remained peaceful for several days, removed barriers and reached very close to the buildings of Prime Minister House, Parliament and Pak Secretariat, while entering the main building of the Pakistan Television’s headquarters. But surprisingly ware vacated simply on a request of the personnel of Rangers and Pak Army without any violence which showed a trust of masses over the impartiality of army.

Unfortunately, when the political crisis intensified, some politicians and most of the media anchors have continuously misguided the general masses by pointing out that democratic system might be derailed, and martial law could be imposed in the country. Some of them played a controvert role in contriving the entire multitude of political standoff between the government and the protesting parties. By manipulating the political turmoil, created by the politicians, they have blamed that Army and intelligence agency, ISI scripted the protest Islamabad.

Even the protesters also gave impression during the mien of happenings that they were at hoodwink of someone in the establishment that although proved wrong latter when PAT out of blue concluded the sit in. In this context, by taking strong exception of false allegations, a statements of the Inter-Service Public Relations (ISPR) time and again categorically rejected assertions that the Army and ISI were backing PTI and PAT in any way in the current political standoff.

Army is an apolitical institution and has expressed its unequivocal support for democracy at numerous occasions. It is unfortunate that army is being dragged into such controversies but integrity and unity of the army is its strength which it upholds with pride. It is an ugly attempt to spoil civil-military relations in the country while in past it was blamed to mastermind the IJI to obtain the results of its own will and its present desire to stay away is being neglected.

Army maintains a totally neutral and entirely impartial stance. It was, however, deeply concerned on prevailing political turmoil. Meanwhile, the ISPR press release regarding the corps commanders meeting held on August 31, reaffirmed support to democracy—the conference reviewed with serious concern, the existing political crisis and the violent turn it has taken. The statement, once again reiterated that the situation should be resolved politically through dialogue, without recourse to violent means.
The government also handled recklessly when it sought Army Chief’s help. In fact, the government itself pulled the Army in politics when, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif asked Chief of the Army Staff General Raheel Sharif to intervene and play his role in resolving the ongoing political crisis. In a good faith Gen. Raheel Sharif met Imran Khan and Tahirul Qadri, but he did not meet Prime Minister Sharif when the latter backed out of his statement, saying in the National Assembly that neither the government nor the Army has asked to play any role of a mediator to bring the current political crisis to an end.

As criticism mounts over the government’s seemingly desperate move to involve the military in the present political crisis, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif told the parliament that it was Tahirul Qadri and Imran Khan who requested a meeting with General Raheel Sharif. On the same day, both heads of the PTI and PAT, Khan and Qadri remarked that the government’s claim that they had requested Army to mediate is nothing, but a blatant lie. Besides, ISPR unequivocal statement verified that the army chief was playing the role of facilitator for resolution of the current crisis at the request of the government.

Moreover, contradiction of Prime Minister Nawaz was further exposed when the Federal Minister Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan also justified military’s involvement as the only option out of the deadlock, saying that the government had asked the army chief to play his facilitative role. In wake of the political uncertainly, join session of the parliament started on first week September. In their fierce speeches, while, indirectly criticizing army, leaders of PML (N) and some other parliamentarians said that they would oppose any move which could derail democracy in the country.

Undoubtedly, democracy has displayed its success in the west, but, it has proved to be fruitless in Pakistan. Therefore, it is generally said that “any instrument can be misused.” Pakistan’s politicians and media have always claimed that they nourish democratic ideals, but, we could not establish this system on a strong footing due to irresponsible approach of our political entities and media.

Even Imran Khan who previously mention some Empire whosoever he is, strongly denounced such accusations, remarked that he never sought Army and ISI help to resolve political issues, adding that he never supported martial law, and always struggled for democracy. Again in his current demand he wants military personnel as member in commission to probe rigging charges in 2013 elections along with judiciary is totally a wild goose chase as army may never accept such a role.

At this critical juncture, our Armed Forces are successfully obtaining their objectives in FATA and North Waziristan Agency (NWA) through military operation Zarb-e-Azb against the terrorists who had challenged the writ of the state, and had frightened the entire nation by their terror-acts. Besides helping the Internally Displaced Persons in the area, our security forces are engaged in coping with the militants’ subversive activities in Balochistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Karachi and other parts of the country including tribal areas.

Externally, Pak Army and Rangers have boldly been responding to India’s unprovoked firing at the Line of Control in Kashmir including Working Boundary in Sialkot and other sectors, and have also been facing cross-border terrorism from Afghanistan side, encountering heavily-armed militants who from time to time, target check posts of the Army, and other civil and military installations. So, Army does not want to involve in political issues. In this context, the mediating role of Army and Javed Hashmi’s statement was acrimoniously politicized which brought embarrassment for Army high command and caused delay in resolution of the crisis.

It is mentionable that external elements like India are keenly studying the developments, taking place in Pakistan and are preparing wicked schemes to damage Pakistan’s interests. Having cancelled scheduled secretary-level talks with Pakistan, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi asserted that Pakistan was too weak to fight a conventional war, ceasefire violations along LOC—and least mentioning about Indian desire to conduct business and trade with Pakistan.

Army as a prestigious institution fully supports the democratic system and averts all skepticism of derailing democracy. Such thoughts are ugly in nature and must not be attributed towards pro-democratic Army. Although Army is concerned about the prevailing political turmoil, yet it maintains a totally neutral and entirely apolitical stance. Therefore, sense must prevail upon those who tend to shift the blame on Army and ISI. As these hostile internal entities have failed in resolving the ongoing grave crisis, they have been dragging Army in politics. (ENDS)

Khurram Shahzad
About the Author: Khurram Shahzad Read More Articles by Khurram Shahzad: 6 Articles with 3877 viewsCurrently, no details found about the author. If you are the author of this Article, Please update or create your Profile here.