NGOs from around the world come
together to celebrate World Refugee Day on June 20. These NGOs celebrate
International Refugee Day by issuing media statements or by tweeting. Countries
that signed the 1951 UN Refugee Convention also claim resettlement of refugees,
but practically nothing happens. For the past five years, only voices have been
raised in favour of the refugees but nothing concrete had been done. The
situation on the ground is that no country is ready to resettle refugees or work
for their welfare. At present, NGOs around the world and the countries that have
signed the 1951 UN Refugee Convention prefer only Afghan and Ukrainian refugees,
whose resettlement in other countries is in full swing. It seems that there are
only Ukrainian and Afghan refugees in this world who are stuck in a quagmire of
problems. Japan, along with the United States, Canada, Europe, the UK, Australia
and New Zealand, is also resettling migrants from these two countries. However,
the resettlement rate of Rohingya, Iraqi, Chinese Uyghurs, Palestinians, Syrians
and Pakistanis in other countries is just 4%. Now the practice of resettling
refugees from Muslim countries like Uyghurs, Rohingya, Iraq, Pakistan, Syria,
Palestine, etc. is declining and soon it will be almost over. All the
signatories to the 1951 UN Refugee Convention are non-Muslims and have so far
resettled millions of Muslim refugees.But now these non-Muslim countries have
apologized for giving importance to Muslim refugees for resettlement. The files
of Muslim refugee resettlement cases, which have been under process in the
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services USCIS and USRAP for decades
have become infested with termites. People who receive refugee status die within
the status of a refugee. On social media, the question is often raised by
citizens of non-Muslim countries that if non-Muslim countries, which signed the
1951 UN Refugee Convention, could shelter and resettle the Muslim refugees, then
Muslim countries should also deal with this issue. In most Muslim countries,
Muslim refugees are held in prisons or immigration detention centres. Can't the
rich Arab countries, Turkey, Brunei and Malaysia help the Muslim refugees? Is
this the responsibility of non-Muslim countries only? These are questions about
which no Muslim country has so far been able to answer or express its shame or
regret. If non-Muslim countries that signed the 1951 UN Refugee Convention are
resettling Muslim refugees then God has special mercy on such countries. These
countries seem to be more developed than Muslim countries around the world
because of their social and humanitarian service. My article is not against
anyone's Religion or caste or country. I just want to say that if Muslim
countries take care of the refugees, then the problem is 50% solved. In the
course of time, humanity has disappeared from the world. The wars in Ukraine and
Afghanistan have made as much noise as the international media, NGOs and the
west. If they had made as much noise about the atrocities against the Rohingya,
Iraq, Palestine, Syria, Myanmar, and Uyghurs, the citizens of these countries
would not be refugees today. The countries responsible for increasing the
refugee population around the world are the ones that forgot the refugees after
signing the 1951 Refugee Convention. Canada's Group Five program for refugees is
also riddled with errors because no one today takes responsibility for their own
son, so how can five Canadians take responsibility for an unknown refugee?
Canadian Immigration Minister Sean Fraser, US Secretary of Homeland Security
Alejandro Mayorkas, and rulers of European countries and the UK keep releasing
statistics on how many Ukrainians and how many Afghans have resettled in their
countries. If you look at these statements, you will feel as if only Ukrainian
and Afghan refugees are oppressed in the world while the atrocities against the
refugees from other countries are not visible to them. Countries signing the
1951 Refugee Convention have not promised to resettle refugees from Ukraine and
Afghanistan and they have not fulfilled their human rights obligations, but they
are acting like "a dove, if he closes his eyes, he thinks the cat isn't watching
him, but the cat swallows him ". The Arab and Asian countries also spared no
effort in treating the refugees harshly. If China wants to become a superpower
in the world, it must adopt a human rights policy in the country. Give political
asylum to refugees who are victims of atrocities. The United States has value
more than China because it has a good record of human rights in comparative
terms. Everyone in the world is willing to be a spy for the United States
because they know that if their lives are in danger, the United States will give
them nationality, money and asylum, but no one is willing to work for Chinese
intelligence agencies. If China adopts a policy like the US, it too can stand in
the ranks of champions of human rights. And if China adopts a human rights
policy and signs the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, it could become a superpower
instead of the United States.