The e-traffic challan system's recent implementation in Karachi has sparked discussions in schools, drawing rooms, tea shops, and social media feeds. Some see it as long-overdue modernization, while others see it as an additional burden in a city already overrun by public transportation, poor infrastructure, and inflation. The true question as Karachi works to digitize governance is whether we are making progress together or if we are building a system that overwhelms some while benefiting others.
The objective of this piece is not to oppose digitization—Pakistan is in dire need of it. Rather, it is meant to draw attention to the fact that even the best policies can fail if they are implemented without taking into account the capacity of institutions, the lived realities of citizens, and the wider socioeconomic consequences. The idea of e-challans seems promising. However, the way they are now implemented frustrates the public and raises questions about fairness, accessibility, and trust—all of which are essential for the success of any public system.
Citizens and the Burden of Adjustment
The average Karachiite—the student riding a bike to class, the hourly delivery driver, the working mother navigating congested junctions, and the daily wage worker struggling to make ends meet—is at the center of the controversy. For some, the abrupt increase in e-challan fines feels more like an unexpected cost of survival than a push toward discipline.
The affordability challenge is a painfully real issue, not just a theoretical one. A corporate executive in Clifton might not care about a challan of Rs. 2,000, but a rider whose daily income is only Rs. 1,200 would be devastated. Another obstacle is digital literacy. Due to out-of-date SIM registration data, many citizens are unable to access the portal, check online fines, or even receive SMS alerts. People don't realize the accumulating fines until their car documents are barred.
Additionally, fairness is at stake. Although minor infractions are frequently captured by cameras with accuracy, what happens when a pedestrian abruptly crosses the road, a signal malfunctions, or a route is poorly marked? People adapt to the reality of the ground, not technology. In the absence of concurrent investments in public awareness campaigns and road infrastructure, e-challans may turn into another situation in which people are held responsible for defects that are out of their control.
Traffic Police: Accountability Meets New Pressures
From the traffic police's point of view, e-challans offer relief from persistent allegations of favoritism and bribery. Theoretically, a digital system enables uniform enforcement and does away with negotiating at checkpoints. This change presents a unique chance to restore confidence for an organization that has long been accused of wrongdoing.
However, the system also presents additional difficulties. The police force itself needs digital infrastructure, training, and open supervision. A badly calibrated camera or an incorrectly issued challan is a government failure, and citizens who are already wary of institutions are inclined to magnify such mistakes.
More significantly, technology does not always increase institutional accountability, even while it may lessen corruption at the street level. The cameras are audited by whom? Who makes sure that vehicle data is entered correctly? Who answers appeals from citizens? The system transitions from discretionary authority to automated power in the absence of a robust grievance redressal mechanism, which is frequently equally frightening to citizens.
Economic and Social Impact: More than Just Fines
Mobility is the foundation of economic activity in Karachi. Ride-hailing drivers, delivery drivers, and small company owners all depend on continuous mobility. Many people may experience more severe financial strain as a result of unexpected financial penalties, particularly in a place with few transportation options.
If properly created, e-challans can have a good social impact on public behavior. Trust-based compliance is more likely to last than fear-based compliance. When citizens feel valued, informed, and supported, they cooperate more voluntarily. Regretfully, a lot of people feel taken advantage of by the current system, which communicates nothing about regulations, payment options, or penalties.
In Pakistan, public trust is fragile. The divide between institutions and citizens is widened when a digital system feels punitive instead of service-oriented. Instead of creating walls, digitization must create bridges.
Way Forward: Digital Policy with a Human Face
Karachi needs e-challans. But Karachi also needs empathy in policymaking.
In order to find a balance between justice and enforcement, legislators need to:
• Start multilingual, easy-to-access awareness efforts throughout the city.
• Prior to imposing fines for associated infractions, upgrade road infrastructure and signs.
• To make the move easier, provide grace periods and first-time cautions.
• Boost grievance procedures to make it easier for citizens to contest unfair challans.
We must make sure that no one is left behind as Karachi transforms into a smart metropolis, including daily wage workers, students, and delivery drivers. Traffic can be controlled by technology, but only empathy can bring institutions and citizens together.
We must develop systems alongside people, not just for ourselves, if we genuinely want safer roads and a modern city.
|