Spitting Fire

(bahjat chaudhry, lahore)

Absolutely obscene! That was all which came to the mind after overhearing the horrendously grotesque language being used by a middle-age individual while he casually engaged in conversation with someone on his cellphone the other day. It was impossible to witness the relentless filth pouring out of his mouth. I got out of there as soon as I could.

Using filthy language in public without even realising it has become a common practice in our society unfortunately.

It is an accepted fact that our rich social values have diminished alarmingly. This, of course, can be due to a variety of reasons. Language — a fundamental component of any high-standard social culture — too of late has fallen a victim to this uninvited plunge.

The decline, in one way or the other, has influenced nearly every social sector. School-going students, being budding minds that absorb many words and actions alike, are certainly among the most-affected souls. Many use objectionable, in some cases, obnoxious language while conversing with each other.

The article is an attempt at highlighting the causes behind young learners’ offensive language — an intricate, gigantic and ever-spreading issue rapidly corroding our culture, one which was formerly loaded with innumerable jewels of social elegance.

While disgusting and hideous language is also exercised at a much higher frequency by college and university students, one believes it is the school days when a tender, naïve learner sows — for himself and society — the seed of that thorny plant called ‘offensive language’.

Education comprises two basic elements: academic advancement and character building.

While the former prepares a school child to secure his future in the physical sense, the latter adorns his soul to ensure the development of a strong but humble heart. Though in some ways both are inter-dependent, good character is the last thing a genuine, far-sighted individual would like to lose out on.

Regrettably, very few school goers these days remember the saying: “If wealth is lost something is lost; if health is lost much is lost; if character is lost, nothing remains behind.”

The social attitude of students, with language use carrying prime worth, reflects a nation’s norms besides providing a glimpse of its likely future. The scenario in Pakistan, containing a distinctively heterogeneous social system, is quite complex. The reasons behind the usage of unpleasant language by a child living in big cities such as Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad or Peshawar can be contrastingly different from the causes of foul language employed by a young learner living in a remote village. Then there is the classification of private, public schools and private, ‘elite’ schools.

Many students in our part of the world use detestable language while conversing among themselves at schools, in their homes, functions and playgrounds — almost everywhere. The worrying aspect of this miserable state of affairs is that a vast majority of the youth do not even understand the meanings of those abysmal and disgraceful words and phrases they express so openly and, sometimes, even pompously.

The use of horrid language every now and then often results in intensified oral clashes among students, sometimes leading to scuffles and brawls. Injuries, which at times can be fatal, create permanent animosities between parents/guardians. The net result: social disorder stretching beyond anybody’s control. Reports of injuries and killing in fights triggered by verbal altercation between teenage students have become a regular feature in newspapers.

The burning question is who is responsible for this gross and apparently unending string of moral breach by students? In the contemporary world, there can be four reasons: parents/guardians, teachers, media or the entire social set-up.

Parents, being the closest and the most affectionate human companions of a child, have a vital role to play in the moral growth of their offspring. If a youngster, who spends around three quarters of a day at home, is adopting an indecent way of communication, it specifies the parents have not covered all the bases in their strategy to make him or her a learned individual.

Teachers, apart from being mere knowledge providers these days, are duly expected to contribute towards their pupils’ moral progress too. Teachers, in their respective domains, can be held responsible for their students’ below-par behaviour within the school.

The media too has virtually become a make-or-break factor in constructing or damaging a social set-up. In certain cases (as in Pakistan) the peculiar social and religious traditions are pivotal in determining children’s (students here) association with the media. A significant portion of our society, which relishes its glorious cultural values of the past, firmly believes that the media, in particular areas and cases, has not played its due role in instilling social values into young minds, language being one of the central points.

The multi-dimensional effects on our young learners due to the foreign electronic media channels showing programmes of their preference, has also been part of a heated debate in Pakistan.

Blaming all major segments of society for this social evil can be a rational thought, specially for the analysts who believe in bringing a comprehensive and stable change through collective realistion and efforts.

Mr Tanveer-ul-Hassan, a veteran math teacher working at an O’ Levels school, with 16 years of experience behind him, on being asked who he thought was most responsible for students’ abusive/offensive language, echoed the above idea.

“This [abusive language] is not a one-man problem. Social set-up has its effects. Every section of the society has to play its role as almost all are making errors at their end,” he said.

While giving the bulk of credit, in case of language decency gained from parents and teachers through inspiration, to the student, he stressed that a majority of parents do not guide their children morally.

“Some teachers lack the dedication and do not impart moral education to students which results in [students’] poor behaviour,” Mr Hassan, who holds degrees in MSc and MPA, added.

Noting sports, which train students in observing discipline (including verbal discipline), the teacher emphasised that in order to do away with this huge crisis, the elders (parents and teachers) should shift responsibilities to young students so that they feel their social utility. Trusting students should be balanced with top vigilance by the parents/guardians, he cautioned.

On asking more than 100 secondary school learners (VII to X/O’ Levels) who they thought was responsible for students’ abusive language nowadays (options: parents, teachers, media or social set-up), around 50 per cent pointed towards the social set-up while approximately 45 per cent blamed the media.

It is very interesting to note here that around four per cent of these students held parents responsible for the language-related chaos while a negligible number singled out teachers as the main cause of inferior language used by their pupils.

It explicitly shows that some of these young minds also feel that spending 16-17 hours in the company of their parents makes them liable to think and take appropriate steps for the moral development of their child.

On the question, ‘Do parents give moral training to their children these days,’ approximately 80 per cent students answered in the affirmative while the remaining 20 per cent replied in the negative. The same query about teachers gave a 60 per cent ‘yes’ and 40 per cent ‘no’ response.

The dim yet positive sign here is that in the present era of sheer materialism there still are many mothers, fathers and teachers sharing ethical facts with students, who on many occasions prevent themselves from using crude language.

Yet, more interestingly, several school teachers, who were requested to pick the basic reason behind the children’s abusive/indecent way of talking, gave a mixed response, choosing media, parents and the social set-up (in descending order) as the major factors.

Following are a few suggestions to solve this agonising problem:

The first and the most important step, which all the key stakeholders (parents and teachers primarily) can take to bring about a positive change in our young learners’ verbal attitude, is continuous and sincere emphasis on morality with use of ‘tongue’ under the spotlight.

And before implementing this crucial yet simple strategy, the elders, having more life experience, will have to set examples themselves. One of the top reasons for moral weakening in young ones is their elders’ free fall in ethical standards, an eye-opening reality illustrated through the example in the beginning.

Second, young students can be groomed, by parents and teachers, right from an early age to develop what can be termed as ‘media intellect’. This is so as media, being a gigantic source of information and entertainment in the present world, can either form a good character or make green minds deviate rapidly from nobility.

Thirdly, general discussions with children on morality, use of language being the core, should be arranged by parents/guardians and teachers on various occasions depending upon time, (student’s) age and requirement. At such candid talks where a few very close relatives and bossom buddies can also participate, the students should be given appropriate time and calculated liberty to express their own viewpoint. The move will gradually broaden their thinking level, making them realise the short- mid- and long-term consequences of poor language.

Fourthly, school administrations, above all those ‘undeclared hindrances’, should fully back teachers in instigating language discipline.

Lastly and very importantly, a permanent and dedicated coordination among parents, teachers, school authorities and students should be developed in order to find a common ground for establishing, intensifying and spreading the highest possible standards of morality, with reverent language being given centre stage.

Courteous language is the very first step towards character building and we as Pakistanis must not forget that Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah underlined character building as one of the elementary pillars of a nation. The structure is weakened with even one pillar missing and the building is bound to collapse, sooner or later. Let us all join hands to eliminate this nightmarish probability.

 

bahjat chaudhry
About the Author: bahjat chaudhry Read More Articles by bahjat chaudhry: 2 Articles with 1249 viewsCurrently, no details found about the author. If you are the author of this Article, Please update or create your Profile here.