(maqsood hasni, kasur)
It is commonly said that the language has no many structural dimensions. The determination of alphabet with respect to writing (Composing) is not correct. The writing that is taught abides by fixed and limited lines or rules. But sometimes, it becomes impossible to follow the lines or rules as a whole. For example, a soldier is passed through the full training of military rules verbally and practically with the With respect to the construction and formation of alphabet, it is expectation that using these rules he would fight against enemy and save himself. But there is nothing as foolish as this thing is. No doubt, all the rules learnt in the training would help in fighting strategy but they cannot guarantee success. In the battlefield a soldier has to do his task according to chance and condition of the battle field. The case of languages is not different from it. The learnt linguistic system and the way of writing are cooperative in writing and speaking. While speaking, the proposed linguistic system and the way of writing become worthless and meaningless. Here only the regular idiom is used and along with it, the present need is kept under consideration. I very keenly tested and studied a lot of hand writings written